Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexie Marie (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Was substantially expanded during the nomination period and consensus now seems to be that it passes the relevant notability guidelines. ~ mazca  talk 17:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Lexie Marie
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Survived initial AFD under now-rejected "one-nomination" standard. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Failure of WP:PORNBIO & WP:GNG. EuroPride (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Thanks to Epbr123's expansion. Passes PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per multiple award nominations.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per award nominations and industry coverage. Dismas |(talk) 09:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG and PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * keep Meets WP:BIO. There's some dispute over whether PORNBIO has consensus behind it, but since she meets BIO don't need to worry about that. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.