Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lezli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Lezli
I had previously nominated an earlier version of this article for. Template removed by page's author. Article may still fall under WP:BIO, as it now has links to specific people's websites. I did not want to relist as db or prod, but felt a discussion is warranted. -- MrDolomite | Talk 07:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete It's just an effort by Lezli McDaniel to keep her name in Wiki by hidiing it among others. No need for a dab page until some genuine reason to disambiguate arises.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - concur with Dlyons493 -- Whpq 12:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity - why do people insist on embarassing themselves like this? Byrgenwulf 13:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Byrgenwulf's comments. Embarassing vanity Scorpiondollprincess 14:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all comments above. Anville 14:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete She made a stencil! wow! Do some people have no shame? --Charlesknight 17:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hopelessly embarassing vanity. "multi-talented firecracker"?!  It's sickening to imagine that anyone out there could write about themselves like this.  Shame on you. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete 'Well known stencils'? Well known to whom? --DarkAudit 00:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.