Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lgbt living & weddings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — Mar. 15, '06 [20:37] 

Lgbt living & weddings
Delete since is one of multiple pages used to promote new magazine. Other example is Lgbt living Wuzzy 17:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This article is part of a linkfarm of three articles that were created or damaged to promote the website. I do not object to, and did not redirect, the LGBT Living & Weddings Magazine article as that article is arguably keepable. However, the website merits one article at most, and only if it is notable. Wuzzy 23:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to LGBT Living & Weddings Magazine since that would likely be the intent of a searcher who types "lgbt living & weddings" and does not know that "lgbt living & weddings" will not find "LGBT Living & Weddings" since wiki is case-sensitive. Wuzzy 23:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete looks like an improperly coded redirect page to me. --djrobgordon 17:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Esquizombi 17:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * i agree with wuzzy i don't know how it got redirected, but i agree with the one article part -- that all i believe is needed at this point. how can we start over. help?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvalles (talk • contribs)
 * I recreated the article LGBT Living & Weddings Magazine. I expect that the others will de deleted in due course. Wuzzy 04:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * delete per nom. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * so whenb will it work -- when users type in lgbt living & weddings -- and shouldn't it come up for lgbt living as well?? and what does delete per nom. mean?? [[user: jvalles]
 * "delete per nom" means "delete this article for reasons given by person who nominated article for deletion" Wuzzy 23:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.