Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiTHUM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

LiTHUM

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication of notability. Disputed prod. Article creator believes a blog is a WP:reliable source to establish notability. noq (talk) 23:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks depth of coverage in reliable, independent sources to establish notability at this time; information found primarily includes self-published marketing materials, social networking sites, and press releases (not to mention a LOT of people looking for lithum batteries). Cindamuse (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORG, should have been speedied in my opinion. Spatulli (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Am I missing something? If not, neither of the two sources referenced even mentions LiTHUM (though they do mention people mentioned in the article). I can find no evidence at all of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. You're not missing anything. The Stupid Genius interview mentions LiTHUM, but the other reference doesn't mention it at all. Cindamuse (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.