Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiWA Living Web Archives (Research Project) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as G4. (regardless of "launch", it is still not notable as was decided in the previous AfD). Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  00:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

LiWA Living Web Archives (Research Project)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as per WP:N and WP:OR to some extent. This article was deleted on 4 February (today) and instantly created once again. This is a non-notable project that have just started. It might be a WP article if it becomes a successful one later. But, for the time being, in noway it deserves to be a part of WP. Thousands of such projects are running under different science foundations and universities in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and many other countries. Moreover, it seems author is directly involved in this project. As it has just started and not published its result yet, its activity through one of its participants will violate WP policy - "No OR". Taking all those issues in account, I am nominating this article once again. --  Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  11:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment--Can't this be speedied as re-creation of previously-deleted content? Gladys J Cortez 20:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Previously this article was deleted based on a core issue that it has not been launched yet though from the very beginning I tried to focus on its WP:OR nature. Editor who created this article took the advantage of that launching issue and as it has been launched few days back, he crated it once again saying that "Okay, now it is launched!". Due to this controversy I preferred AfD instead of Speedy. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  00:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.