Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Europan lingues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 18:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Li Europan lingues

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

While an interesting piece of computer lore, it is nearly 98% hearsay, failing verifiability criteria. `'юзырь:mikka 22:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 
 * Keep. The term yields almost 20k unique ghits of its use precisely the way the article describes.  Ford MF 23:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment While usage is verifiable, it seems to fail notability, as nobody has actually written about this in a reliable source. Possibly merge to Lorem ipsum or Occidental language. --Dhartung | Talk 00:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Krakatoa  Katie  06:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 06:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Dhartung; maybe filler text is the right spot to merge to? John Vandenberg 07:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and mention on filler text as an example; no need to merge most of this. csloat 08:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve sourcing. WP:PAPER.  Tom e rtalk  21:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.