Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Ruigang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv  🍁  06:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Li Ruigang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Would even request speedy deletion. Lily Ding Li Xiang (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: Nomination was not properly transcluded onto log until 13 December 2020
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 07:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 07:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, he is very much notable businessman with a lot of media presence on the level of Jack Ma, Pony Ma and others. He has his own Britannica article. Kolma8 (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: An article on a businessperson with a history of building multiple notable companies and interests ("Li, an English-speaking media mogul dubbed the Rupert Murdoch of the East" The Guardian, 2015) as well as of political appointment to a Shanghai position described as "roughly on par with the director of the Chief Executive’s Office in Hong Kong" (Hong Kong Economic Journal, 2017). I think the available references, as well as the rather basic Britannica entry, are sufficient for WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO criterion 3. AllyD (talk) 15:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Nominator is nominating articles based on having same last name as username. Previously nominated a car company called Li Auto for deletion as well. Albertaont (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.