Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Shuangde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Someone can create a redirect if they wish. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  17:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Li Shuangde

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BLP1E, and hence WP:N. Does not meet WP:RS requirements: of the two citations available, one is a blog, and another from the "Chinese Human Rights Defenders" website, which is not a WP:NPOV source. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 06:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Vanity page of a one-hit wonder who is impossible to cover neutrally since he is only covered by blogs and advocacy websites. Quigley (talk) 06:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per the above. Violates WP:N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zlqq2144 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Complies with WP:N as a lawyer defending people who cannot afford it for free and with WP:N as a human rights activist. Besides the indicated references, which mostly comply with WP:RS, he has been reported upon in April in Chinese 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Japanese, Italian 1 2, French, German, and English. Definitely worth an article. — Waikiki_lwt Talk &#124; contribs &#124; email 09:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you do realise that the Chinese sources come from Epoch times (pro-FG, anti-PRC) and Asianews (pro-Christian missionary, anti-PRC), both are activist/partisan groups.Zlqq2144(Talk Contribs) 09:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And the Italian ones come from Asianews too. Zlqq2144(Talk Contribs) 10:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to some appropriate article about recent events in China. In the non-self-published sources, the subject is only mentioned as a lawyer working pro bono, but there is nothing about him apart from that mention. This is not enough to support a biographical article per WP:BIO. The article can be restored if the subject is covered by reliable secondary sources in some depth.  Sandstein   07:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.