Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li lonp

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 02:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Li lonp
Player characters in MMORPGs are not notable. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 9 July 2005 03:37 (UTC)


 * He is just as notable as, say, Ceciliantas . Keep 5th edit by User:Eowaraldur
 * That you for pointing out that someone had recreated that article. It was deleted via VfD some time back.  I do agree that this is almost as notable as Ceciliantas; in other words, delete.  -Sean Curtin July 9, 2005 04:37 (UTC)
 * Eliminating this entry would be like eliminating George Harrison's entry for Beatles fans. MMORPGs are a substantial force on the internet and its notable personalities must be documented for all of eternity. I say keep! - Sunlapse User's first edit.
 * Delete fictional vanity - augh. CDC   (talk)  9 July 2005 03:55 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. And article seems somewhat confused. Is Li lonp male or female? Pburka 9 July 2005 03:58 (UTC)
 * You have got to be kidding. Delete. --Calton | Talk 9 July 2005 03:59 (UTC)
 * This is a very important character in the world of Azeroth. Deleting the entry on Li lonp would be akin to destroying the constitution. -- 's only edit.
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 9 July 2005 04:39 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nuff said. Dusik 9 July 2005 06:49 (UTC)
 * KEEP - what else is Wiki for if not useless information? :D Dimble ThriceFoon This vote represents 's only two edits.
 * Useful information. Delete. Leithp July 9, 2005 08:27 (UTC)
 * As useful as, say, an article on Exploding Whales ? 's seven edits are all to this VfD, to the article, or uploading images for the article.
 * Delete. Non-notable. And if I don't get to put my MMO characters up, which are impressive fake entities, why should this guy? :) --FreelanceWizard 9 July 2005 13:14 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't resist voting delete on sock-puppeted VfDs about made up 'characters' that exist only because of a few thousand lines of computer code. -Splash 9 July 2005 13:58 (UTC)
 * Delete, completely ridiculous. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 17:35 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with all above reasons for delete.--Bhadani 9 July 2005 17:54 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fictional vanity, whatever that means. - Thatdog 9 July 2005 18:37 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, and just plain stupid at the same time. Boyinabox 9 July 2005
 * Delete -- it's articles like these that make me ashamed to play video games -mysekurity 21:40, 9 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.