Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Dryden (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Liam Dryden
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural AFD: died at AFD once, then was PRODed again. PROD nomination was: "Non-notable internet personality. References are almost entirely made up of the subject's own Tumblr and Twitter accounts, the record label that he is signed to, and unreliable sources such as "The Skinny" and "We the Unicorn". Any reliable sources (e.g. the BBC) mention only things that this individual has been involved with and don't mention him at all; notability is not inherited." I concur. This looks plausibly good until you look at the content and sources; it's WP:PUFFERY. David Gerard (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nominator and WP:BIO. Not an independently notable Internet celebrity. A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 23:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks the level of notability to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.