Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam McEwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to The Flea 88.2. The Bushranger One ping only 03:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Liam McEwan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article has been often speedily deleted and was salted. A request for restoration at Deletion review/Log/2012 August 3 resulted in no consensus about whether the article's recreation should be allowed. The version of the article that was proposed for recreation is therefore referred to this board for a decision about the topic's notability. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.  Sandstein  13:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to The Flea 88.2. Liam McEwan has enough sourced coverage to warrent mention, but falls a little short of enough coverage to justify a standalone article.  He only has coverage in relation to his association with The Flea 88.2.  As this target article is currently so small, it is unlikely that individual hosts should be spu out as separate articles any time soon.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to The Flea 88.2 per SJ. Sources not there for article, but enough to mention at the station. Hobit (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge as mentioned already in the DR: I don't think that this person is notable. mabdul 23:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that this article is well written, and factual. Have been looking for info on the subject for a while now. Thanks! 19, August 2012(UTC)
 * just saw this article. interesting, his Bieber interview is well done. Article is factual from what I have heard. 14:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.195.199 (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.