Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam McNeill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Liam McNeill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. I failed to locate any significant coverage of reliable sources that are independent of the topic. McNeill has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions and thus failing NACTOR. Most of the films and series listed in the filmography section may not be notable and none of his roles are significant (the closest one is being an ex-husband in Manchester by the Sea). He has been nominated once for a Screen Actors Guild award as part of a cast and has won two not-so-well-known awards but the ANYBIO criteria requires at least nomination of a significant award or honor several times. — Za  wl  17:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   17:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   17:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete- As per nominator fails GNG and NACTOR.  FITINDIA   18:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- agree WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EC Racing (talk • contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The subject's roles to date are not significant enough to meet WP:NACTOR, and I'm not finding in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.  gongshow  talk  23:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.