Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Liam Young

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very few secondary sources found; what little exists talks only about his Big Brother appearance. Reads like an advert. Nobody cares, as usual. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:BLP1E, reads as an ad. Ironholds (talk) 04:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP1E, also borderline G11. The Wordsmith Communicate 04:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above (GregJackP (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete per WP:ONEEVENT. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  07:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ONEEVENT, WP:BLP1E, WP:SPAM.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and create Redirect to Big_Brother:_Celebrity_Hijack; if we're going to have gigantic Big Brother articles, it's little surprise someone will try to create contestant articles, and they should be redirects when they pop up. THF (talk) 09:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd say no to the redirect. Someone could easily overwrite it with the same crap. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 13:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The way to deal with that problem, if it arises, is to protect the redirect rather than refuse to create a redirect that will help our readers (the important people) to find what they are looking for. A protected redirect is a much better safeguard against recreation than a red link. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per THF. '  ArticlesFor Redemption  '' 03:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.