Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lian padukan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant    talk    15:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Lian padukan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non martial art without any reliable sources to assert notability Dwanyewest (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —Astudent0 (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This article clearly needs to be sourced and improved. However, my search showed there appears to be enough out there that this article could be salvaged (although not by me). Astudent0 (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep A Google search found a fair number of hits, but I had trouble trying to determine if any of them qualified as reliable sources. However, some of them seemed like they might be independent so, for now, I'm willing to keep this article around in the hope that an interested party improves it. Papaursa (talk) 20:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep I added links to two articles from the Straits times a reliable source(they could be incorporated better) Francis Bond (talk) 01:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.