Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liane, Jungle Goddess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Liane, Jungle Goddess

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced. No showing of notability or SIGCOV. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator: At this point, I feel sufficient sources have been found to prove up at least GNG and likely NFILM. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film,  and Germany. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Keep, it doesn't have to be unsourced. The German Wikipedia article has sources. It was a very successful film that also raised some controversies, pushing frontiers in what was then acceptable (near-naked woman!). Given that it was released in 1956, we have to have some understanding that everything written about it at the time, and for decades after its production, will be on paper. Its current availability and internet presence demonstrates that it has lasting cultural value. Elemimele (talk) 06:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC) Comment: I was about to withdraw the nomination, but "withdrew the withdraw" after taking a closer look at some of the sources offered by Siroxo, most of which appear to be passing/trivial mentions, where this film is offered as one item in a list of examples. I'm not yet convinced there's enough here to make this film stand on its own as independently notable. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep in some form. It's very likely both the film and book are notable . Other helpful bits of SIGCOV that should help get us to GNG for the film itself: &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Added some sources to the page. Clearly notable, as a basic internet search can show. Keep.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm now convinced and will withdraw. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I that case there is no need for me to also vote keep. The German article Liane,_das_Mädchen_aus_dem_Urwald has three references and lists three books as sources. Did you do WP:BEFORE? --Bensin (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I did, but this film isn't that well known in the English-speaking world and so there was a dearth of sources. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.