Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liaqat Ali Khan (mathematician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Liaqat Ali Khan (mathematician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Its more like a CV than a biography of encyclopedic nature. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS.  Greenbörg  (talk)  14:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete 368 citations seems too low to pass WP:PROF in any field, and I haven't turned up any significant awards or the like which would count towards the other criteria. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per scholar and book citations, and the numerous publications by the subject. Given that the internet did not exist some decades back, online coverage is not the only medium which needs to be relied upon.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please, familiarize yourself with WP:GNG and WP:V because no article can pass GNG with namecheck or single source discussing him.  Greenbörg  (talk)  16:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete h-index is clearly low for WP:PROF particularly WP:PROF and and could not find adequate coverage to meet general notability guideline and fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citation counts from his Google Scholar profile are too low to pass WP:PROF, although mathematics in general is a low-citation field. Campus-level awards are insufficient for #C2. And beyond those two criteria, there seems nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.