Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK 1 (non-admin closure) Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A notable organisation but the tone of the article is written like an advertisement. Ayub 407 talk 09:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable per nom. The article has been pruned of the unsourced, flowery language. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as mentioned as the historical connections should certainly be enough for a notable and acceptable article, familiar attention will also be needed if better sources are unavailable for English users. SwisterTwister   talk  05:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is articles for deletion, not cleanup. Even the nominator says it's notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * What I'm trying to say here is that the article is written in the tone of advertisement. We're seeking consensus to decide whether the article should stay or be deleted. Ayub 407 talk 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:AFD, first bullet. I think I have addressed the issues with tone. I don't think a reasonable editor would look at the article and find fault with the tone. Do you think we can close this nomination now? EricEnfermero (Talk) 17:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We're here to decide whether the subject is notable enough for an article. Since you yourself have said it is then why nominate it for deletion? Anything else is cleanup and that's not what AfD is for, since that's easily remedied - just delete anything that looks like an advert and hey presto, decent article! -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright. I see your point. Article was significantly improve since this nomination opened. I agree now to close the nomination. Ayub 407 talk 04:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.