Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liar In The Glass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Eyes Set to Kill. Cirt (talk) 08:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Liar In The Glass

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article has never existed or has been deleted QuestionOfAnarchy (talk) 11:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The artist's article, Eyes Set to Kill, does exist and has not been deleted. In the absence of evidence that the songs have any strong claim to notability on their own, merge all four songs to their parent albums. Bearcat (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Just another non-notable single. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 22:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable non-charting song. JamesBurns (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Bearcat. Since this song has no qualifier in its title, it's a perfectly fine redirect option. - Mgm|(talk) 10:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —-- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  22:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.