Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libélo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Valence, Drôme.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  16:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Libélo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

PROD removed with comment "Article has subsatnce". Non notable bike sharing scheme in one city in France, fails WP:ORG Jezhotwells (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  -- Jezhotwells (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- Jezhotwells (talk) 20:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge a summary with Valence, Drôme, where the scheme operates, omitting detail on subscription rates, which may vary from time time. The subject is of minor noteworthiness, but is currently too like an WP:ADVERT.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete could only find 1 gnews hit. . LibStar (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Valence 2010-2011. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * does this book cover the subject in depth? This is one source, you need multiple sources to demonstrate notability. Please read WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 08:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You tell us that you found a Gnews hit. 1+1=2. Q.E.D. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * you need indepth coverage, multiple non-indepth coverage does not count. does the book you refer to cover the subject in depth or does it merely mention this bike scheme? LibStar (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 2 sources, or 2 hits in gnews does not make an article. LibStar (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, that is not substantial coverage. I think that merging with Valence, Drôme is the best way forward. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete; fails to show significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources. Ironholds (talk) 06:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment- I like the article, and it may be useful to our readers, but a merger may be best for now. It is a very short stub lacking major sourcing, unless some more sources can be found quickly. Bearian (talk)
 * Merge to Valence, Drôme. This is a sensible alternative to deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.