Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LibTom Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per failure to meet notability. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

LibTom Project

 * — (View AfD)

This software is not notable according to any criteria in Notability (software). The author has requested its deletion, saying, "With respect to Tom_St_Denis I did not put the page there, nor do I want a page about` myself on Wikipedia. Please remove it. Same goes for LibTom_Project. I don't think Wikipedia should be polluted with small projects and people, and I certainly don't  want to be known as a person to cause such pollution." &mdash; Matt Crypto  01:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

i wrote it to complete a bit what was already there, but as Tom itself asked, please remove it.

Alejandro Mery 01:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't say it's CSD G7 material, but delete per nom anyway. MER-C 04:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ← A NAS  Talk? 19:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Baristarim 19:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only reference is to the LibTom project's web page, and there is nothing in the article that says that LibTom is considered to be of great importance. For comparison, I notice we have no article about LibTiff, which I'd guess is more important; it is of moderate importance in that it is actually used in the implementation of many commercial and open source applications which deal with TIFF files. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed, delbleated this page already. BTW I've closed libtomcrypt.com until both pages have been removed.  Enjoy.  -- Tom


 * Delete per nom. WMMartin 17:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Failure to assert notability. —ShadowHalo 06:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.