Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Booth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Libby Booth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Booth doesn't appear to be especially significant. None of the "Artcles and media" references indicate she is notable. She doesn't seem to have received any major awards. I've Googled her for a while but can't find anything non-trivial. A bit iffy (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  —A bit iffy (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  —A bit iffy (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's see... the "external links" section links to her website and DeviantArt pages, the "articles and media" section contains links that have only a few mentions of her name, I can't see anything to assert that she is particularly notable in some way as to warrant having a full Wikipedia entry.  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 09:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  freshacconci  talk talk  09:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, not an encyclopedia candidate...Modernist (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - perhaps some day she'll attract notice, but it hasn't happened yet. Bearian (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not much in the way of google news or tertiary sources Vartanza (talk) 04:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable and no third party independent refs. Redgramsci and 97.84.132.167 are the only ones to have worked on this article, and only on this article, so it might be self written.-- Arty pants, Babble 15:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.