Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Gill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:HEY. (non-admin closure)  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 12:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Libby Gill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Promotional article. References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely on company produced material and/or quotations. Edwardx (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable consultant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This seems to be a PROMO article from the early days of WP. The tone is PROMO, pic is paid-for upload, article written by anon SPA, etc. She has authored lots of books/videos in the "self-help" and "business-help" sectors, but holdings are low hundreds or less, which I don't think is especially high for these pop sectors of publishing. Most of the sources seem to be web pages. Seems to have flown under the radar for a long time as a result of low page views and being an ORPHAN. Agricola44 (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Searching for "executive coach" has led to several AfD nominations. No doubt there are other job descriptions one could search for that should be equally rich seams. Edwardx (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I worked on this last night and would appreciate 's input, too. I took out a lot of the puff and the poor citations and I added reviews from several reliable sources about her books. In addition, she was an important figure behind the success of Dr. Phil's show. Passes CREATIVE for reviews of her works and probably GNG for her high-profile roles in several orgs. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CYBERPOWER  (Around ) 03:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements by Megalibrarygirl.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY by Megalibrarygirl.Thsmi002 (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.