Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Hoeller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 06:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Libby Hoeller
Nothing important or signficant here. I think it goes against WP:LIVING. Rob 21:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed (ESkog)(Talk) 21:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, possibly could be classified as a legitimate internet phenomenon, but the information in the article is not WP:V. There is no evidence her real name is even Libby Hoeller. If you take out everything that can't be verified you get "college chick who danced around naked to crappy early 90's music in 5 videos". Minorly notable perhaps, but I don't think having hordes of boys spank it over your misappropriated videos quite meets WP:BIO.  --Isotope23 21:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per ESkog. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 21:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems (barely) notable. A drian L amo ··  21:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. At the least, this counts as one of those porn fads along the lines of "Drunk Girl at Mardi Gras" and "Psycho Girl".  Pervasive in some ways, yes, but not encyclopedic IMHO, and not notable otherwise like Paris Hilton or even Severina Vučković.  Boy, I know too much about this topic... --Kinu 22:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2 examples of when having hordes of boys spank it over your misappropriated videos is notable...--Isotope23 23:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; way too much speculation in the article, not encyclopedic Ergot 22:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, if you follow the underground porn, this is significant thing. Should porn fads NOT be documented. --vossman 22:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn.Blnguyen 00:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't think that she is notable enough. In recent times, Wikipedia has set a rather high standard concerning pornographic performers. If only it would do the same with bands and non-pornographic actors. -- Kjkolb 01:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 03:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. You must be kidding.  One of the great internet porn memes, discussed on Howard Stern by Stern and Jimmy Kimmel back when it was more famous.  Completely insane that this would be deleted. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, lack of verifiability here. Stifle 16:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pending citation of a good source to show that the various factual claims of the article could be checked. --W.marsh 20:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per badlydrawnjeff.  Grue   13:21, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Even if the actual events can not be verified, the phenomenon can be. Internet events are hard to link to real life people and places because of the anonymous nature of the internet. But the event happened, this discusion is proof of that, as is 41,500 results on a google search for Libby Hoeller. I am sure that the other spellings of her name would bring even more results. Getting information on obscure subjects such as this are one of the main reasons why I find Wikipedia such a valuable resource. I do agree that information needs to be verified, but in this case the phenomenon is a fact even if some of the details are not. --Kyle k 22:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Nees slight revisions, but if you delete this you should delete all internet/cultural phenonomon's such as the Star Wars Kids, references to Urban Legends, etc.
 * Keep. notable internet meme. Regularly discussed on numerous online messageboards even to this day. --Madchester 19:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.