Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libera (Book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Libera (Book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about non-notable book. Prod removed by article creator, who just happens to have the same name as the book author. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, book is self-published/pay-to-publish. Hairhorn (talk) 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Hairhorn.  GregJackP   Boomer!   03:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability for this book, published this year through AuthorHouse. (It would be good to have a CSD category appropriate for books, given the increase in print-on-demand publication.) AllyD (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the WP:GNG because there are no reliable sources about this book. Vcessayist (talk) 01:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable book. (Article created by spam-only account with username matching the name of the author.) JamesBWatson (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, Self promo defintly in violation of WP:PROMO per Amazaon.com: About the author, where it says, "About the author: Adrian Jeens has been a passionate LIBERA fan for many years. Based in the UK, he is the webmaster of www. libera-fans-uk.com which caters for thousands of UK fans of the group, as well as a growing number from overseas. He enjoys attending the group's concerts and listening to their music. By writing this book, he hopes to expand the fan base of LIBERA across the world still further from what it already is." Thanks,  &mdash;  Jason Sosa  08:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As spam. Does not meet notability requirements.  Although some self-pub books eventually do, it's rare, and this is not one of them  dangerous  panda  11:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As written, article has neither reliable citations nor notability. Title of article also seems wrong. Article doesn't seem to be responding to my searching for a Lazarus of Bethany Factor. Suggest delete the article, and if the book is just fabulous, let someone add it as an external link to the choir article.
 * Delete Not notable. — ΛΧΣ  21™  18:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.