Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberace (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was RESULT. Materialscientist (talk) 04:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Liberace (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails notability guideline for future films and general notability guideline. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * delete per nom, fails NFF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaijin42 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete as part of a wave of hoax articles submitted by this user.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's certainly notable in real world terms (see these for example:, , , , , , , , , ) but its title isn't Liberace and as it is currently only planned, with filming due to start in Summer 2012, it could still never happen and doesn't merit an article. It is already mentioned in more detail at Liberace, which seems the best place at this time.--Michig (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Call it an exercise in crystal ball reading, at a minimum. Carrite (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Michig has it right. WP:TOOSOON. Will almost certainly become notable, if and when it gets made. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.