Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberal landslide

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 19:41, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Liberal landslide
The full text of this article is "The results of various elections have been popularly described as a Liberal landslide when a party of that name won decisively, that is a Landslide victory. These include:" (followed by a list). This does not add in any signficant way to Landslide victory -- it only compiles a list of landlside won by parties wwith "Liberal" in their names. Note that "Liberal parties" do not necessarily have anything in common -- they include two disparate parties in the UK, the conservative Liberal Party of Australia, the conservative British Columbia Liberal Party, and the ultra-nationalist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia. Delete. Ground Zero 18:45, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with ground Zero. Meelar (talk) 18:55, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Perhaps some way could be found of incorporating the list with List of liberal parties, where the debate on what belongs in a list of liberal parties and what they have in common has taken place.  --Tabor 19:41, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless list. --Carnildo 21:31, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge into the list on landslide victory. - SimonP 21:33, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete not a worthwhile article. Mozzerati 17:52, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .