Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberation 71


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Liberation 71

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:N, the article does not have any reliable source to demonstrate notability. AdrianGamer (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Prothom Alo, The Daily Sangbad and Kaler Kantho look reliable enough to me. What's wrong with those? Huon (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Prothom Alo is actually the largest newspaper in all of Bangladesh as well. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 18:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: As the article itself lists more than 5 different news agencies reports on it, there cannot be any doubt to its notability! – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 18:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article has multiple independent reliable sources. Original reason for nomination is invalid.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 01:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is well sourced. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.