Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party of Massachusetts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  16:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Libertarian Party of Massachusetts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no sources except to its own website. There is no evidence that this party has any elected officers or that it been mentioned in a non-trivial way in reliable sources. Any useful information can be folded into Libertarian Party (United States). Toa Nidhiki05 01:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - It will be far better to keep the article and improve it rather than delete it as the Libertarian party is important enough to have state affiliate pages (like the Green-Rainbow Party) and if you look at the article now I have greatly improved it and plan on doing so with more references in the future. Jon698 23:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Not a ton of sources at present but sufficient to meet notability standards.--TM 11:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to  Libertarian Party (United States) .  Fails WP:SIGVOV - I searched. I see that many of the other pages in Category:Libertarian Party (United States) by state are equally deficient in available sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Jon698. I added some bits as well. Article meets aforementioned notability criteria. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 20:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. --  Dane talk  04:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:SIGVCOV. XavierItzm (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.