Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Socialist Caucus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Libertarian Socialist Caucus

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a disambiguation page for two articles that don't exist. There aren't sections within the mentioned broader articles about these caucuses, nor are they even mentioned by name in those articles. I'm not sure what the purpose is for a disambiguation page when there's not even any ambiguity in the first place. Nothing even links here. Grnrchst (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism, Organizations, Politics,  and United States of America. Grnrchst (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reason to have a disambiguation page until the two items get their own articles. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems especially odd that there doesn't appear to be any explicit information about the "Libertarian Socialist Caucus" on either of those pages. How do we even know the disambiguation information is correct? If they are equal in status, it can't be a redirect, either. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and others. No sense in having a disambiguation page for non-existent articles, especially when neither of the broader articles referenced on the page contain any explicit information about the subject. Sal2100 (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per usual practice for a dab with two entries. I would not oppose a redirect to Horseshoe theory or one of the links. Bearian (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.