Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian perspectives on child pornography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. The keep is a technicality as there are no remaining arguments for deletion. Editors may wish to boldly merge the page, or discuss it first. Fences &amp;  Windows  03:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Libertarian perspectives on child pornography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This does not appear notable. I cannot find reputable sources specifically summarizing libertarian views on child pornography, and though there are anarchist or other takes on the issue as cited in the text, that does not justify a separate page. The page's material can be moved elsewhere. Rehoboam (talk) 10:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * merge with Laws regarding child pornography and/or Criticism of laws regarding child pornography. Thryduulf (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with a merge to Criticism of laws regarding child pornography. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Everyone, I also agree that the article's content should be merged into Criticism of laws regarding child pornography, but do we really need a redirect with this page's title? It does not seem like something anyone would ever type. Rehoboam (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see what harm a redirect would cause, and redirecting avoids WP:MAD problems. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge per Explodicle. We have articles on libertarian perspectives on abortion, libertarian perspectives on war, etc. so the redirect is not too implausible. Tisane (talk) 22:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 'The editor who nominated this article for deletion wishes to Withdraw the nomination. Uninvolved editors are asked to review the debate and close it as Nomination Withdrawn. Consensus is merge and the redirect is a minor issue'' Thanks, Rehoboam (talk) 01:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.