Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian perspectives on gay rights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. WjBscribe 20:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Libertarian perspectives on gay rights

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original Research Amourfou 15:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC) This page is original research. As I commented on the discussion page (as an anonymous user at the time), this is filled with weasel words and no citing. I appreciate the effort that other editors have put into this page, but it really reads like something out of a magazine or school report and not an encyclopedia.
 * Keep. I think that the simple fact that the article refers to and directly cites the official platform of the Libertarian Party of the United States to demonstrate that the article is sourced, and is not based on original research. The only thing I think is missing is a comparison of various libertarian parties worldwide. samwaltz 12:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but whittle it down - it's currently an essay - Tiswas (t/c) 15:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete; i think that NOR applies in this case. additionally, the goal of WP is not to repeat what can be found elsewhere. mkushnir
 * keep and rewrite seems to be notable and encyclopediac, but clearly needs sources added.--Sefringle 22:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * keep and rewrite, parring down to a stub for now if that's what it takes to remove what people reasonably believe to be incorrect or otherwise problematic. But I am not convinced this topic would be impossible to source properly... the article needs work, not deletion. --W.marsh 22:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Madhava 1947 (talk) 09:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Care to elaborate? This is not a vote. - Tiswas (t/c) 09:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Useful encyclopedic article. Should be based on referenced material. Madhava 1947 (talk) 10:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.