Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library Tales Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Library Tales Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No assertion of notability per WP:CORP; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; references are all press releases from the company, apart from one brief mention in a local paper. Evident WP:Conflict of interest by article's creator, though that on its own isn't sufficient reason to delete. Filing Flunky (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Filing Flunky (talk) 01:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I am also nominating the following related article, about a book (and related merchandise) from the publisher above, whose sole claim to notability per WP:Notability (books) is that it was briefly reviewed on a television chat show, and has been used to teach courses in Unity Churches in the US. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, and with the same conflict of interest by the article's creator (though again, that on its own isn't sufficient reason to delete):
 * Filing Flunky (talk) 01:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Sources are not good enough to satisfy notability guidelines. Very few hits come up. Tinton5 (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero &#124; My Talk  20:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Worldcat shows only one book of theirs, The thought exchange  -- which is held in only 6 libraries. Obviously not yet a notable   publisher, and not yet a notable book either.  DGG ( talk ) 22:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.