Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library consultant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Library consultant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an original research essay, possibly a copyvio by the way it is written, but I haven;t found it yet. It's interesting but not valid in an encyclopaedia Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I don;t think its  OR, since it is sourced; but what its sourced to is not   usable, being just  an advertisement for a particular library consultant, www.acohen.com/. There probably are real sources, but this article would have to be re-created properly. DGG (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I never noticed the A Cohen link. A Cohen is also the creator of the article.  Suddenly this looks like spam and this pretty much Speedy Deletion material.  Since this AfD is already running I'll leave it to the community to choose where to go with it.  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.