Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is clear consensus to keep this page. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Library system

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a useful article: a "library system" is either the library service of a university, local authority etc, or it's an Integrated library system (Library Management System in UK), the issue, catalogue etc system. This article doesn't improve the encyclopedia. Pam D  07:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think we have a number of librarians who can comment on this better then I can. I think the article refers to the concept of "main library with branches". It may be notable... or not. I did find so at the very least this merits a closer look at sources and usage. Could be just redirected and merged to library, perhaps? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  08:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Library system article is about the systems that involve buildings, main libraries, branches, librarians, other library employees, and that can or not use a Library Management System to control and perform library operations. Thanks.--P2prules (talk) 02:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've been curious about library systems before, and I could have used this article. Icebob99 (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- notable topic of how regional libraries are organised; sources presented at the AfD / available in the article sufficiently meet GNG, IMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.