Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libras have more fun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE by unambiguous and unanimous community decision. -- Psy guy Talk 04:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Libras have more fun
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a magazine. --Spring Rubber 06:51, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per reason above. --Spring Rubber 06:51, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JHMM13 06:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Herostratus 07:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly non-notable research result. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 18:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am an Aquarius and greatly enjoying voting for the deletion of this vacuous tosh Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 18:41, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Stifle 00:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.