Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Licence to kill

Licence to kill was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was consensus not reached

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * This article is redundant. I do not believe the tiny amount of information given here is even accurate; moreover, this page could easily be confused with Licence to Kill.--XmarkX 01:40, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * redirect to Licence to Kill -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 01:48, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect Keep stub. -Sean Curtin 02:36, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect. The info. in the article is explicit in the term: license..to..kill. Geogre 02:38, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect Cutler 21:13, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect. (I've also made license to kill a redirect so we don't have to go thru this again.) Niteowlneils 03:58, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've expanded it a little but there's plenty more to write on the use of licenses to kill by state actors. It's not solely a James Bond concept, as the press cites given and a straightfoward Google search excluding James Bond indicates. Jamesday 05:08, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * keep - state sponsored murder etc is a huge and fascinating subject and the article could well be made to expand in this direction --Refdoc 16:44, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)