Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liddo-kun's Big Adventure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Love Hina. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Liddo-kun's Big Adventure
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Minor part of the plot (even the article admits this) with no need for a seperate article, non-existant notability outside of the franchise Dandy Sephy (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Love Hina, likely search term. Note: you could just have boldy redirected it. 76.66.198.171 (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This article isn't a likely search term though. Nor do I see how it would merge into Love Hina. Redirect perhaps, but not merge. I haven't used bold because I don't believe there is a need for the article, or even a redirect. Dandy Sephy (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect as per 76.66.198.171. Edward321 (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'll have to call undue weight on this one. The details are already covered by the episode/volume summaries, and other then the Liddo-kun pushie, which should be covered by the character entries, it didn't play a significant role in the story. It is also not a likely search term. --Farix (Talk) 12:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Love Hina to also allow interested editors to perform a merger. Seems like a very nonnotable fictional element, but two other-language wikis also have articles on this topic, so at least some claim could be made that it's a popular search term. – sgeureka t•c 14:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.