Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lidia Aviles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Lidia Aviles

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

My intention was to put this for WP:A7 as I could not establish notability for an academic, but I thought to put it for discussion as being an EU Climate Pact Ambassador might be an indication of notability! Still I think this article should be deleted FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lack of sourcing. When sources are in Danish, Spanish, Arabic and English, something's fishy. Sources appear mostly primary or non-RS. Innovation Expert is so broad as to be almost useless as an indicator of notability. Oaktree b (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't seem to be notable, only passing mentions in the vast majority of sources. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 20:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Generally pass GNG because being an EU Climate Pact Ambassador is an indication of notability. 102.91.48.185 (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * no, it is not. the position itself is not notable, there is no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources for it. So please do not write an article about the position. In addition, as per their website, The following individuals can become Pact Ambassadors:
 * Leaders of organisations or associations
 * Community leaders, leaders of informal groups or movements
 * Mayors, parliamentarians, policymakers or other public office holders
 * Representatives of cultural, educational or research institutions
 * Influencers, opinion leaders
 * Except of part of no. 3, these are vague descriptions and there is a need of significant coverage from reliable and independent sources which for this individual are currently not their. FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.