Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lido Learning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. deleted by admin DGG per G11 (non-admin closure) Megan☺️   Talk to the monster  11:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Lido Learning

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. No effective referencing.  scope_creep Talk  18:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:NCORP not established, PROMO issues. Also, article does not have enough categories. (...just kidding about the categories!) 1292simon (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

1) Added more categories 2) Removed future planning in Young Leaders Scholarship. Added objective and advantages of it 3) Added more references

Literacy in India is a key for socio-economic progress. With revolutions in the Edtech domain, online education in India has seen rapid progress as it takes away some of the major limitations of conventional classroom learning like location, accessibility, transportation etc. Lido learning focuses on teaching Maths, Science, English, and Coding online to kids in the K-12 category. The Wikipedia page of Lido learning is very important to create awareness and visibility about the organization that provides online education to children. Hence I request not to delete the page. Also, it would be great to get more feedback for improving the page and I will be happy to work on it accordingly. Thank you! Dr. Punit Mangal (talk) 19:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I speedy deleted this as G11, promotional, before reading the above statement. that statement certainly confirms the promotional intent. Wikipedia is not intended to be used for advocacy. .  DGG ( talk ) 03:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.