Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liebermann Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Liebermann Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A trivial, long defunct company that either didn't trade at all, or didn't trade very much. Most of the article is unsourced and speculative, and what sourcing there is doesn't say much more than "there was a company; it said it wasn't a trick". None of this establishes any kind of notability - the coverage is shallow and passing, and comes from a single source (WP:CORP notes "A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization"). Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 10:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 10:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 10:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this and its coverage seems better convincing of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  03:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete the first paragraph which has been there since the start seems to prove its unnotable. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.