Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liebert (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, consensus is that the new sources found during this AFD establish notability. Davewild (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Liebert (company)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP, seems purely promotional with no secondary sources. It used to be a barely-decent stub and has now turned into an advertisement. - Warthog Demon  18:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP and is basically an ad created by User:Liebertwiki (COI?). Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The anon adding more to the article is also registered according to WHOIS to the same Liebert Co. hmmmmmm.... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a very notable company in its field, and there should be plenty of information available on it to write a decent article. I'll see if I can find some.  BradV  19:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. I think the company is notable. I also removed at least one exclamation mark and in general tried to make the text more NPOV. --Eastmain (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep major company in the field. DGG (talk) 03:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Added references establish notability. The peacock terms have been removed, and the article no longer reads as advertising. Jim Miller (talk) 12:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.