Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I count one source in this article which isn't 100% actually about Russia–Ukraine relations, a topic on which Liechtenstein is 100% aligned with it's much larger neighbours. This is a WP:COATRACK article for things already said much better elsewhere. PROD removed by creator without improvement. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Ukraine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: Once again, as I stated on Talk:Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations I don't agree that either of your points that justify any kind of deletion are true. As far as I know, many of the things on this page are either not available elsewhere or covered with bare minimum facts which strongly justify it's own page. With that in mind, I fail to see how this meets WP:COATRACK criteria. Furthermore, the notion that only one source isn't completely about Russia–Ukraine relations is rather bogus, since all relevant sources there play into Liechtenstein's reaction and involvement with Ukraine. Several others just cover their relationship in general, as minimal as it may be. I can't be improve a page if you don't give any elaborate suggestion I'm afraid.TheBritinator (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 00:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Also agree this is not a coatrack article. Even though the topic isn't significantly large, it's valuable enough to keep centralised and has reasonable coverage. --  Primium  (talk) 02:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - article covering a valid subject. - Indefensible (talk) 05:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A valid subject does not necessarily mean notable. LibStar (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.