Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lied Place Residences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 03:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Lied Place Residences

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

no evidence this is a notable building or project CUPIDICAE💕  20:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Nebraska. Shellwood (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources available such as:
 * Lied Place Residences developers make case for additional TIF dollars
 * Topped-out Lied Place Residences in line for more TIF money
 * Lied Place Residences ground-breaking Wednesday
 * Police identify man killed in construction accident
 * Construction on new Lincoln skyscraper set for 2021 completion
 * Major development proposed for downtown Lincoln

NemesisAT (talk) 21:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Those are all local papers that are effectively business announcements, not substantial coverage of the building itself. CUPIDICAE💕  21:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG doesn't exclude local coverage, and I disagree that they arne't substantial coverage. They cover the whole development or project, and I feel establish notability for it. NemesisAT (talk) 22:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Further sources:
 * First residents expected to peer from awe-inspiring glass at Lied Place by football season
 * Lied Place will rise rapidly with four floors of office space, 37 condo units

NemesisAT (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete No effective references. The coverage above is incidental, run of the mill stuff. No effective coverage.   scope_creep Talk  07:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Here's a source assessment table:

WP:ROTM is an essay, what is important is that the subject passes WP:GNG. It does pass, as demonstrated by the source assessment table above. NemesisAT (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 07:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify. The "article" here is essentially a blank page? The only content here is an infobox? Regardless of whether this is notable or not this is currently in no state to remain in article space. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Also the creator appears to have attempted to try to draftify it then requested deletion on the talk page. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I've written some text now, so this is no longer a concern. This includes additional references on top of those I already mentioned above. NemesisAT (talk) 10:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: let's see if we can avoid a n/c, because right now there isn't one Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: It is apparently 20-story building, or perhaps equivalent to 22 stories, and is a skyscraper.  The fact that it is a skyscraper and that it might possibly be huge, be among the tallest buildings in Lincoln (i don't know) is not mentioned in the article.  User talk:NemesisAT, some context about its size esp. relative to other buildings in Lincoln would improve the article and would likely help establish its significance to the AFD editors here. --Doncram (talk) 23:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge: Per List of tallest buildings in Nebraska, it is in fact the tallest building in Lincoln. Another option would be to expand the row at List of tallest buildings in Nebraska (now with "id=" type anchor so it can be linked directly) by putting descriptive info into its right column cell, and to redirect Lied Place Residences to there, i.e. to merge this article to there.  However if there is enough sourcing and material for a separate article, it should be kept as a separate article. --Doncram (talk) 00:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.