Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life:) Belarus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Life:) Belarus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It exists, but I couldn't establish it is WP:NOTABLE. Possible redirect to Turkcell. Boleyn (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  16:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As per nominator's rationale and no other !vote made
 * Comment per above I would recommend relisting again rather than soft deletion. This is an article on a non-English language topic and it has WP articles in 5 languages, as well as having existed for several years. None of this proves notability at all, but means it is worth careful consideration. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -  Harsh  06:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This lacks sources in English to establish notability. I know that's a de facto reason to delete something, but doing a quick glance over of sources in other languages it seems like they are all extremely trivial topics that don't pass WP:NCORP. For instance them opening new stores or costumers complaining about their service sucking. Which could apply to any mobile operator. Maybe there's a speck of gold in there somewhere, but it's doubtful and un-realistic to expect anyone who only speaks English like me to find it. It's fine though since there are other language articles about it, that would be relevant and readable to people where the company operates. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, a brief search of the web shows mentions of the company's existence and coverage is trivial, does not go beyond the existence or services of the company. Coverage of Belarusian topics is difficult due to the lack of media infrastructure. Might be better suited to a local version of wikipedia. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 20:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.