Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LifeBank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

LifeBank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think it meets our subject specific notability threshold of WP:ORG. I didn't found any in depth significant coverage. I was about to CSD A7 again when I found an unsourced credible calm of significance in the article.  Jim Car ter  04:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 10:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 10:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD: Non-notable; the claims of significance in the article are barely significant. "Affiliated with a large bank" might barely be significant for a person, but for a corporation, no. Esquivalience  t 14:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I simply see nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.