Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LifeLine srl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

LifeLine srl

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable borderline G11 eligible article on an organization that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - the undeclared COI could hardly be more obvious. Deb (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP and per Deb.--  Ts12rAc talk to me 12:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The article fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. -Imcdc (talk) 12:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of independent and reliable references. Fails WP:NCORP. Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The article lacks quality in terms of sources and writing format. The subject just doesn't deserve a Wikipedia page for now.--Art&#38;football (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.