Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life Begins for Andy Panda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  HurricaneFan 25  00:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Life Begins for Andy Panda

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non notable article without any reliable sources to assertain it notability therfore it should be deleted. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Significant as the first of many Andy Panda shorts by animator Walter Lantz. This short was notable enough to be mentioned by name in Lantz's New York Times obit, and sufficient sources can be found at GBooks for example . --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per errant nomination rationale. With respects to the nominator, topic notability is dependent upon the topic being covered in relaible sources, and NOT upon whether or not an article on that topic contains those sources.  We do not delete articles on demonstrably notable topics simply because their current state lacks use of available sources. We instead look first to see if sources are available, and only then judge whether or not concerns are addressable.  That said, and with appreciations to User:Arxiloxos, it was easy to determine that this topic has the required siginificant coverage as is veriably unique in its being the very first Andy Panda cartoon ever. Time to fix, not delete.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable. SL93 (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Enough secondary sources to support a claim of notability.--Cavarrone (talk) 10:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.