Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life cycle sustainability assessment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Life cycle sustainability assessment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redundant article since we already have Life cycle assessment. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

LCA is a method to measure environmental impact, LCSA is a new method environmental, social and economic impact. Method are similar but not the same, so article is not redundant. --79.216.125.62 (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No credible assertion that this is different from LCA. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this like creating a page for something called a "Sandandwich" which is "A food that contains a sandwich, bread, and lunchmeat"? 157.235.66.80 (talk) 17:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect per WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no indications on why this concept is notable or significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.