Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Life economy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essay--no evidence of any notice beyond the first article proposingthe theory  DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete the whole article is basically an essay that completely fails to establish notability. I also have some suspicions that it was translated (and copied) directly from a Russian article.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 * Comment screening out "second life", I found a few news sources, none of which were immediatly helpful. Perhaps userfy? Bearian (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete One link is to a primary source, the rest are not to anything that is related directly to the article subject, and the sources available on search (even using Cyrillic) are unconvincing. This seems more like a case of WP:NOT than anything else.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.