Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life of da Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per unanimity of responses (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 01:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Life of da Party

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N, its the third single, not really notable for its own article.  T r U C o  - X  16:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - The song has charted. Peecee1978 (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 *  Keep  Weak keep - According to WP:MUSIC, a song is only notable if it has charted on a significant chart. It has.  I have revised my vote to a weak keep.  It may be charted, but not noteworthy. phoenixMourning ( talk/contribs ) 20:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Yes, it's entered four Billboard charts, and that most likely makes it notable. However, keep in mind that WP:MUSIC only says that a song is probably notable if it charted. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per TPH. Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  18:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Charted and may go higher yet. SunCreator (talk) 23:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment-well consider expansion.--~ S R  S ~ 03:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.